FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN - Dear press members, esteemed participants, today we are completing the fifth Antalya Diplomacy Forum following an intensive, high-quality, and productive work.

For three days, Antalya once again served as a hub where the pulse of global diplomacy beat. From keynote sessions to regional workshops, we successfully carried out a comprehensive program featuring a wide variety of formats and content, all together. Over the course of 52 sessions, we had the opportunity to assess the current crises together. We had the opportunity to listen to and engage in discussions with leaders, decision-makers, and experts from all around the world, from the Asia-Pacific region to Latin America, and from Europe to Central Asia, all under one roof. I would just like to share a few figures: This year, 6,400 participants from 150 countries and 66 international organizations attended our Forum. This is actually a very large figure when compared to similar organisations. Both in terms of the geographical area it covers and the number of participants. 23 Heads of State and Government, 13 Vice Heads of State and Government, Speakers of Parliament, 50 Ministers, and 87 high-level representatives of international organizations participated in our forum. During the Forum, our President held a number of high-level productive meetings. our Vice President and other Ministers held productive and constructive meetings with his counterparts who had come to our country and participate in the Forum. I also held discussions with a number of our counterparts and representatives of international organizations.

During the Forum, we also had the opportunity to host critical meetings that will shape the international agenda, on the side-lines of the Forum. At the Quadrilateral Meeting we held with Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Pakistan, we discussed steps to support peace and stability in our region and potential initiatives aimed at permanently establishing freedom of navigation. We have identified the concrete steps we will take to develop a shared vision for the future of our region. At the meeting attended by six Muslim countries, we discussed the progress of the Gaza Peace Plan. We reaffirmed our shared commitment to the process. We discussed the joint initiatives we will implement together to establish lasting peace in our region. At the Informal Meeting of Foreign Ministers of the Organization of Turkic States, we had the opportunity to discuss the issues on the agenda of our shared region. In addition, we held the Third Meeting of Foreign Ministers of the Balkan Peace Platform here, on the side-lines of the Forum. We also had the opportunity to discuss our future steps regarding operational cooperation in the ground. In the context of the situation in Gaza, the high-level session titled “One Heart for Palestine: Protecting the Future Against Destruction in Education”, organized under the auspices of Mrs. Emine Erdoğan, the First Lady, was one of the most meaningful gatherings of our Forum.

Dear members of the press; Under the theme “Mapping Tomorrow, Managing Uncertainties”—which formed the intellectual foundation of our forum—we have conducted a comprehensive overview of the future political, economic, and diplomatic landscape. Representatives from a wide range of regions had the opportunity to once again express their perspectives on global and regional issues at the heart of diplomacy. The Antalya Diplomacy Forum has once again demonstrated and tested its ability to bring together diverse perspectives, regions, and interests around the same table. During our sessions, the idea that regional crises can only be resolved through the dynamics of that region itself and with the active participation of regional actors emerged clearly. Our sessions on the global economy were equally productive. In an era marked by rising protectionism, we have had the opportunity to repeatedly emphasize the contribution that investments, free trade, and connectivity projects can make to international stability. In today’s world, where geo-economics is being redefined, the question of how to strike a balance between global and national priorities and the role of multilateralism in this equation, as well as the crises we are currently facing, were also thoroughly discussed.

We are placing special emphasis on the African continent again this year. The continent’s investment and development potential was discussed. At the same time, we carefully assessed the critical link between security and development. Here, too, the participants had the opportunity to emphasize once again the importance of local ownership. One of the events we will hold following today’s press conference is focused on Africa. At this event, we will have the opportunity to come together with our African brothers and sisters and friends. We will also exchange ideas on how to further advance the Türkiye-Africa partnership.

Dear members of the press; At our Forum, we have taken diplomacy beyond its traditional boundaries and brought it into the realms that will shape the future. The geopolitics of artificial intelligence—which will shape the world of the future—strategic competition over critical minerals, and the redrawing of the global energy map were also discussed at this year’s Forum during our panel sessions. In the context of the lead-up to COP31, which we will host, we emphasized the importance of food security and stressed that measures to address drought and climate change must not be sacrificed to geopolitical tensions. The events organized in the field of cultural diplomacy were among the meaningful gatherings that complemented the multifaceted structure of our Forum. At our Forum, held under the theme “Mapping Tomorrow,” we did not overlook the true owners of tomorrow. As part of the ADF Youth Event, we will have the opportunity to meet with the younger generation shortly. Together with their vision and energy, we will shape the world of tomorrow.

Dear press members; I would like to express with great pleasure that in such a challenging period when uncertainty and multiple crises have become the dominant features of the international system and polarization has begun to replace dialogue, the Antalya Diplomacy Forum has emerged as a rare global platform for hope, dialogue, and solutions. This Forum has also served as a testament to the diplomatic expertise and organizational capacity of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs. As Türkiye, we will continue to conduct our foreign policy without being confined to narrow frameworks, guided by the principle that diplomacy is the key to peace. We are determined to continue leveraging all opportunities offered by diplomacy to diversify our cooperation and strengthen our bonds of friendship. We continue with the same determination to build trust on critical issues, bring the parties closer, and, when necessary, assume the role of mediator. Hopefully, Türkiye's influence in the field of diplomacy continue to grow with increasing momentum in the coming period.

As I conclude my speech, I would like to once again express my gratitude to our President and the First Lady for their strong support and kindness toward the Antalya Diplomacy Forum. I would like to thank once again all my colleagues, our local authorities, and all the organisations, participants and volunteers who contributed to the success of the Forum.

I would also like to extend my special thanks to you, dear press members, for your valuable contributions in ensuring that the messages from our Forum reach a wide audience.

I suppose I can now take your questions. Mr. Kemal, let’s start with you.

QUESTION: Thank you, Mr. Minister. Kemal Öztürk, I am asking on behalf of NTV and Al Jazeera.

Mr. Minister, as you mentioned in your speech, you also held separate meetings on regional crises during these gatherings. One of these is the third meeting held with Türkiye, Pakistan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. The first was in Riyadh; then in Islamabad, and now in Türkiye. Is the aim of this meeting to make progress on the defence pact? This is my question. This is because some politicians and media outlets in the Israeli press are describing these alliance talks as a "radical Islamist" or "radical Sunni" alliance. How would you describe this alliance between these four countries in the context of these talks?

My second question is that you held a meeting on the Gaza issue as a follow-up to the US peace plan. However, from the failure of aid to reach Gaza to many other issues, the situation has reached a deadlock. Given this uncertainty, which is the slogan of your Forum, what course of action will you take regarding Gaza? What is your strategy? Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Thank you.

As you mentioned, we held the third meeting of the Pakistan-Türkiye-Saudi Arabia-Egypt Quadrilateral Meeting. We have shared this with the public as well. As we have repeatedly made clear to the public, from the very beginning, our objective has been to ensure that these four countries continue on their path with a genuine, realistic and achievable agenda, addressing all issues that require regional ownership... Our leaders are determined to address this issue. As Foreign Ministers, we are also putting this commitment into practice, exploring how it can be applied in the real world across a wide range of sectors, including the economy, technology, healthcare and defence. Here is what we believe: These four countries actually represent a certain group. There is an entire region surrounding these four countries. We have a firm conviction—and a rational assessment—that our region has failed to realise its own potential because it has not made use of the opportunities for cooperation that it should have. Building on this observation, we are coming together to put these concrete ideas into practice. As you know, there are some really serious political crises and conflicts. What can be done to resolve these conflicts? We are not like Israel. As you know, they have joined forces with the Government of the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus to form a military alliance against the Muslim countries in the region. We don’t do what they do. How do we resolve the conflicts in our region, how do we achieve economic progress, and how do we establish stability? We are currently searching for these. We have seen that if this region continues to rely on outside help and wait for a saviour, it will remain stuck with these problems forever . That is why wise people learn from the past and use that wisdom to shape their future.

The meeting we held on the Gaza issue: as you are aware, the Gaza Peace Plan is currently in the implementation phase. The Group of Eight, which led to the launch of the Gaza Peace Plan... As you know, our Leaders met with Mr. Trump in New York last September. In line with the views and resolve expressed here, mechanisms such as the Gaza Peace Plan and the Peace Council began to be implemented. We have now come together once again with the countries that embody the founding spirit of this initiative. We have engaged in very detailed discussions regarding where our efforts and work to stop and reverse this genocide in Gaza—along with the decisions taken, the vision set out, and the structural institutional developments over the past period—have led us.

QUESTION- [SIMULTANEOUS TRANSLATION] Adnan Can Ataytürkmen, Al Araby TV

Esteemed Minister, during his meeting with the President of Pakistan, Mr. President stated that there is a need for a new regional framework, and also that there is a need for a new security framework to counter the war being waged by the US and Israel against Iran. Is it envisaged that this will be established in partnership with you, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt? Is it envisaged that this cooperation will evolve into a response to these challenges and to counter Israel’s expansionist policies, which pose the greatest threat to the region?

My second question is about the Strait of Hormuz. What is Türkiye's view and stance regarding Iran’s closure of the strait?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN – Dear friends, thank you for the question. As I said a few moments ago, the countries in the region must come together and take responsibility for the problems facing the region. This is vital for us. We, as Türkiye, firmly believe that we have the maturity, capacity and vision to achieve this. Our President has demonstrated a very strong determination in this regard. Over the years, they have reached a consensus on this vision with regional leaders. Now it’s time to put this into practice. As you can see, there are many problems in our region. We are coming together and seeking ways to eliminate all the factors—the genocide in Gaza, the situation in Lebanon, and subsequently Iran—that have undermined trust among the countries of the region, fuelled conflict, and brought about poverty and underdevelopment. When our President met with Mr. Shehbaz Sharif and Sheikh Tamim, they, of course, discussed regional issues. Once again, the discussion centred on this vision. This is a vision that everyone embraces. We hope to continue to move forward with our agenda based on this vision.

There is currently some confusion regarding the Strait of Hormuz. The parties have stated that partial blockages occur from time to time. We are also closely monitoring the situation through our Navy. As developments take place in this matter, we continue to keep the public informed.

QUESTION - [SIMULTANEOUS INTERPRETATION] Keir Simmons, NBC News

Whilst this Forum was taking place, Iran’s negotiations were also ongoing. Could you give us some details? President Trump said that he had held important talks with the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament and that a peace agreement was not far away. But now we see that the region is once again being dragged into war. What’s going on? Could you explain it to us?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN – Dear friends; as you are aware, we are not only closely monitoring the ongoing negotiations between Iran and the United States, mediated by Pakistan, but we are also doing our utmost to provide every possible support. By consulting with both the US and Iranian sides, what kind of contribution can we make to the current efforts of our Pakistani brothers? We are currently searching for these. It is clear that the talks have now reached a critical stage; everyone knows this, of course. The good news is that both sides continue the talks with genuine intent and sincerity, and they are determined to continue. It is not just the parties, but the whole worldis clearly breathing a sigh of relief following the current ceasefire. Of course, it is important for everyone that it continues, and I can see that the parties involved are also aware of this. All the stakeholders we have met here at this Forum—from the east, west, north and south—are constantly expressing their concerns to us that the war must not start again. We, too, are saying that we will do everything in our power to address this matter. We are aware that, at this stage, the parties are still in disagreement on certain issues. I don’t wish to go into the details of this; I also had an important meeting with the Pakistani side before I arrived. Where do we stand, and what are the next steps we need to take? Of course, now that the ceasefire is due to end next week, nobody wants to see a new war break out again. We hope that, once again as a result of pressure from the international community, the parties will extend the ceasefire and, during this extended period, resolve the issues that they have so far been unable to resolve but are seeking to address. As we said at the beginning, dear friends—perhaps those who have been following will remember. A two-week ceasefire is a good start, but the agenda ahead is so extensive that it will not be possible to resolve all these issues within two weeks. Therefore, a further extension will be required. I hope this extension happens, I’m optimistic about it, but certain matters need to be clarified. For the most part, we are seeing that the negotiations have been concluded, but differences of opinion remain on a couple of very critical issues. I hope, as soon as possible, it will…

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FIDAN – Gökhan Çeliker, Anadolu Agency.

In fact, Antalya Diplomacy Forum stands out as the only forum attended by the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of both Russia and Ukraine for years. Türkiye is also experienced in bringing the parties together on four occasions. Here, both Lavrov, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia, and Sibiha, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, expressed a positive view toward a process in Istanbul. Do you expect any shift in the parties’ positions or an intention to negotiate?

Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FIDAN – Dear friends, as we follow closely the negotiations between Iran and the United States, we follow closely the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. As you know, we undertake a role in that issue when necessary. This war, now in its fifth year, must come to an end, it has imposed a significant cost. However, the fact that the war continues in a specific region is being taken for granted by now. This is not a favourable situation for either Ukraine or Russia, we need to continue by increasing the efforts for peace. Türkiye has the vision and endeavour to this end. Last summer, we brought the parties together in Istanbul on three occasions, we are ready for another occasion, at both technical and leadership levels. But the parties also convene in other capitals.

We observe that – we have been discussing it, and I feel no hesitation in stating here that: While the negotiations between Iran and the United States continue, the war between Iran and the United States has in fact clouded the more urgent problems, that is to say, the attention of the international community to the Gaza Peace Plan and the peace negotiations in Ukraine has appeared to decline suddenly. As a reflection of this, we have a strategic concern on facing certain inconveniences in this issue. We are already urging the parties so that this will not occur. We reiterate that you should not distract us by these issues, both Gaza and Ukraine are significant issues. We need to maintain our attention to these issues, we have that capacity.

Question: I participate from Azerbaijan. Hayale Reis, Chief Editor of the website express.az.

My question is: While the peace process between Azerbaijan and Armenia continues, Türkiye considers this process as an opportunity to establish a new model for global diplomacy as well as ensuring global stability. If so, is this model also applicable in similar conflict regions, and how can this model have a global impact?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FIDAN – Dear friends, we also have significant efforts for ensuring peace in South Caucasus. We wish to ensure stability in that region as well. In essence, the foreign policy vision of our President has been clear from the beginning: What we wish for one region, we wish the same for the other. We have a stance which prioritizes peace and stability in every region so that we can build development and prosperity. Now, there is a significant progress in the ongoing negotiations between Azerbaijan and Armenia. As you know, the peace agreement was initialled with a ceremony held in Washington but there are a few more steps for final signing. However, the work we have conducted so far has shown that both parties are quite committed to seeking peace, and willing to take further steps; they can take such risks and there is also tremendous interest and support of the international community for this issue. Of course, Türkiye will continue to stand by Azerbaijan in this issue, this is our destiny. However, we believe that there will be more stability in the region as a result of the peace established by Azerbaijan and Armenia. This is quite important for all the peoples in the region.

Question – [simultaneous interpretation]: I’d like to thank you, Mr. Minister. Kübra Akkoç, TRT World.

Now there is a cease-fire in Lebanon as well. From your perspective, what is the importance of the cease-fire in Lebanon for regional peace?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FIDAN – Dear friends, Lebanon is one of our important and complicated cases. As you know, we are in a deep solidarity with the Lebanese people; our President has made statements in this issue. We continue our activities on humanitarian aid for certain regions in crisis at the moment. Unfortunately, Lebanon is falling victim to the brutal grip of war once again. While they are already struggling with ethnic, sectarian and religious fragmentation, we can also observe that they have faced Israeli occupation recently, that millions of people have been displaced due to the occupation and besides that, through their repeated announcement, Israel started to implement the regional practices and occupation policies in Lebanon as they carried out in Gaza. Both regional and international public opinion are quite concerned about that. And not only for humanitarian reasons. That is an occupation which will seriously affect regional stability. However, the ongoing negotiations between Iran and the United States seem to have overshadowed that. Israel is trying to take advantage of that and create a fait accompli. So, that should be prevented. We will make efforts to this end.

Please go ahead, our Greek friend,

Question – Hello Mr. Minister. Manolis Kostidis, Kathimerini Newspaper and Skai Television.

In one of your recent interviews, you stated that Greece, Cyprus and Israel were conducting, or seemed to conduct an operation to surround Türkiye in Eastern Mediterranean. You indicated that this issue is on your consideration. What gives rise to that impression? Because Greece says “Türkiye has many cooperation activities as well.” What gives rise to that impression?

I have one more question. Greece has submitted a letter to the United Nations stating that their right to expand the territorial waters of the islands to 12 nautical miles is reserved, besides, that they wish the amicable resolution of this issue with Türkiye in accordance with the international law. What is your message about that? Thanks.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FIDAN – We cooperate with the countries in the region, and as you know, NATO is a military alliance. Greece also takes part in NATO. So, since you have asked, I indicate the fact that Greece, Israel, and Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus have established a military alliance and formed concrete troops… The threat priority is apparent: Along with Türkiye, other countries. So, no one can expect this situation to give a different impression. No assurance or statement to the contrary was given either before or after. While these alliances were being established, no one told us “We did not take this action against you.” On the contrary, when the leaders met in the ceremony in which the alliance was established, the Prime Minister of Israel made statements, defining the spirit and cause of the alliance, on the occasion attended by both the Prime Minister of Greece and the Leader of the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus. Given these facts, I think our reaction is too mild due to our negotiation process with Greece. In fact, we never intended to disturb the spirit of cooperation. However, in that meeting, the Prime Minister of Israel indicated the existence of concrete military formations and military cooperation. We cannot ignore it. Greece can conceal it, or explain it in another manner. Greece is already a member of NATO. Then they are involved in such a military cooperation with other countries.

No European country, except Greece, sign such an agreement on military cooperation or establishment of joint military units. This is not a source of concern or trouble solely for Türkiye. Although they do not express it, all the Muslim countries in the region are deeply concerned and asking questions, based on Israel’s expansionist and occupation policies in the region. In light of this situation, it would not be appropriate to suggest that Türkiye is expressing undue concern. There are the realities, facts, and concerns of the countries in the region. Türkiye has the self-protection capacity, however, let me point out that there are more vulnerable countries in the region which are concerned about that military alliance.

Question [simultaneous interpretation] – Thank you, Mr. Minister. My name is Abdulhamid Sayen.

I had asked you a question last year. I had asked exactly what kind of concrete steps Türkiye had taken to stop the genocide in Gaza. Now I’d like to say: The genocide has not come to an end, it continues in Gaza and West Bank. The genocide continues in Southern Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. Your Excellency, don’t you see that the Republic of Türkiye will be the next target of Israel if Israel happen to break the resistance in Gaza, West Bank, Lebanon, Syria and Iran? Thanks.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FIDAN – We thank our friend for his sensitivity towards Gaza.

It is clear that efforts are being made to continue the genocide in Gaza in different ways. Of course, that happens in an environment where people are subjected to hunger, exposed to cold, and deprived of the necessary shelter. We can see, and we have stated that in every occasion. As the international community, we have convened in order to implement the Gaza Peace Plan, and we are making efforts to put it into practice. Our H.E. President launched an intense negotiation process with H.E. Trump and the leaders in the region last year. Though, everyone knows that Israel hasn’t changed its policy for depopulating Gaza, which is their main intention, by killing or displacing the people in Gaza; no one declares it, but everyone knows it.

Therefore, the international community is making significant efforts to take necessary steps to prevent that by using all means of diplomacy, as frequently used in Antalya Diplomacy Forum as well. The matter is the issue of Israeli expansionism. Indeed, we define the issue with these words while you define it with long explanations. The issue of Israeli expansionism has become a security concern not only for the region, but also for the whole world. The matter how and by which method the expansionism can be prevented by the international community is also a topic on the agenda of the international community. I believe that there will be positive developments in this matter as well. Because all the actors that we come together have the same concern. So, no one can find excuses for Israel’s expansionism. That is not sustainable, either. We are talking about an irrational, fundamentalist government continuously stimulating and stimulated by international crises, which has become a trouble for the world. This is not an issue solely for Türkiye. Although some try to associate this issue with Türkiye too much, this is not solely our problem. This is not an issue solely for the region, either, indeed, we are talking about a security concern that has become trouble for the world, resulting from a fundamentalist government.

QUESTION- [SIMULTANEOUS INTERPRETATION] Mr. Minister, I would like to thank you for your speech.

My name is Mercy Bamigbola and I come from Nigeria. I represent here the only Turkish channel broadcasting to 49 countries in Africa. I have a question regarding diplomacy and mediation. Türkiye has positioned itself as a mediator in this sense, an actor who can play this role. Could such mediation be undertaken regarding conflicts in Africa as well? What priorities has Ankara set in terms of regions where it can play a more active role at present?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Thank you.

For sure, we strive to play the same role in Africa as we do in other regions. Here, we have a strategy focused specifically on conflict resolution and providing support for nation states' security challenges, particularly in the fight against terrorism. We are proceeding with dual-track approach. Economic, commercial, developmental, and technical cooperation—all of these are already in place. Strategically, we focus specifically on conflict mitigation and counter-terrorism; these two sources of instability are of particular concern. We have serious findings, we have extensive work underway, and some of it is reflected in this report.

As you know, Türkiye has supported the ongoing counter-terrorism efforts in Somalia. Likewise, we have established cooperation on this issue with Nigeria. We will further develop this; it is necessary for the stability of the country. It also applies to other countries. On the other hand, the mediation we conducted between Somalia and Ethiopia regarding the resolution of their conflicts; under the leadership of our President, was of utmost importance. Similarly, Türkiye fully supports the ongoing efforts for national reconciliation in Libya. We are exerting every effort to stop the ongoing civil war in Sudan. Our close monitoring of the issues between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo continues, and there are several issues of conflict that I prefer not to mention at this time; these are sensitive matters of dispute among regional countries. We are also closely watching these. Africa has never been off our radar in this regard. We know that, that is, it is in everyone's interest to use the experiences we have developed in resolving conflicts in our region elsewhere as well.

QUESTION: Ali Veliyev from the Azerbaijani press and the Editor-in-Chief of the Manşet.az news website.

There is talk of signing a peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Will Türkiye now make effective use of soft power to achieve the signing of this peace agreement? You know that there is a major economic issue in the region, namely the issue of opening the Zangezur Corridor. The Zangezur Corridor is important both from a regional economic perspective and for Türkiye. What efforts will Türkiye exert to make this happen?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN - As I just stated, I hope this agreement will come into effect and we will see the completion of the efforts made so far. We are already seeing the effects of the blessings brought about by the absence of conflict and the moment of peace in the region. With the final agreement, we anticipate that normalization between countries, Türkiye-Armenia normalization, and Azerbaijan-Armenia normalization will have very significant consequences in the region both in terms of connectivity and in terms of economic, commercial, and energy security. There are concrete indications of this. Our region is particularly important regarding the realization of the Middle Corridor. In this regard, the stability in the South Caucasus after crossing the Caspian Sea is important for the stability of the Middle Corridor as well. The Zangezur Corridor is also extremely important in terms of strengthening Türkiye's connectivity in the region. We have close collaborations with the European Union on interconnectivity projects in this regard. These issues will also be discussed with Ms. Marta Kos soon. I hope that when the peace agreement is signed, you will see that the countries in the region will experience significant positive developments both in terms of connectivity and economic development. In other words, we are very close to this. I hope it will be realized as soon as possible.

QUESTION - Deniz Kilisloğlu, from NTV television.

Based on your statements, I have a few questions to ask. Is there a timetable being worked out regarding the extension of the ceasefire, is there a specific duration being considered? You said you had an important meeting in Pakistan. We inevitably wonder. Have you received an update? When will the new tour of negotiations take place? What are your expectations in this regard? They mention Monday-Tuesday this it true?

And my last question will be about the Lebanon ceasefire. The ceasefire between Iran and the United States expires on Tuesday, but the ceasefire in Lebanon covers a 10-day period. Do you think there is liaison between them? Do you view this 10-day period as a goodwill gesture, or do you see it as a tactical timeframe set for negotiations between Iran, the United States, and Pakistan? Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN - As you know, essentially, the most important reason for the ceasefire was to enable negotiations. At present, while a ceasefire has been proposed, the difference in perspectives between Iran and the United States has led to the continuation of the occupation in Lebanon and the ongoing killings. This was viewed by Iran as a violation of the ceasefire. Now, with the involvement of the parties, a 10-day ceasefire has been declared in Lebanon. Of course, this was intended to be put forward as part of a general ceasefire so that negotiations could be possible. Now, as I just said, in response to another question. The entire world public opinion clearly wants the negotiations to continue. There is a very strong will and pressure on this issue. No one wants the war to start again. The negative impact on energy security is evident. The pressure on prices is obvious. Currently, some countries are declaring it, while others are not, but it is causing serious financial difficulties and damage to the budgets of many countries...For the 2026 budget, it has at least brought about an unforeseen and irreparable setback.

Therefore, under the pressure arising from this situation, I believe that the parties should see no obstacle in extending the ceasefire to continue peace negotiations. Unless there is a significantly different development or the parties feel the need to implement another coercive measure to prove something to each other, I believe that the ceasefire will be extended here and negotiations will be allowed to continue. Perhaps, hopefully, there will be a more optimistic scenario; by then, the main framework of the negotiations may have been completed.

QUESTION- Eda Tuğrul, News Global.

One of the key topics discussed at the Forum, actually one of the focal points for the leaders, was the new world order that would emerge in this global landscape characterized by increasing uncertainty; and a memorable photo was captured: President Erdoğan, President Aliyev of Azerbaijan, and Prime Minister Sharif of Pakistan.

What kind of message did that photo send to the world?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN - This is actually a message of solidarity among brothers. You know, the three leaders are truly fond of each other, like brothers. They have formed a bond of destiny and have repeatedly proven this. At the same time, they reflect the sentiments of the states and nations they represent.

Moreover, it is something we have long missed and felt a sense of longing for: that, inspired by our leaders, these countries come together through a sense of regional ownership, make efforts to resolve their issues, and handle their affairs in a professional manner. There is clear need for these countries to engage in sincere and close cooperation in order to establish a system based on peace, stability, and mutual respect. Given our system of governance, the will of the people is entrusted to the leaders, who in turn exercise this will on behalf of their nations. Therefore, when leaders come together and demonstrate such positive solidarity and fraternity, I believe this sends an exemplary message to the world.

Question- [Simultaneous Translation] Meys Nassif Tahiroğlu, from Yeni Şafak Arabic.

My question is as follows: What kind of balance is Syria trying to achieve to establish sovereignty in the new era? What kind of timeline do Syria and Türkiye need to follow regarding military agreements, and what kind of work is envisioned by Türkiye regarding the Hejaz Railway in the future?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN: The discussions held by Mr. Sharaa on the occasion of this Forum, have repeatedly brought these issues to the agenda, dear friends. He met with our President and, as you know, I also met with him on the first day. Now, if you observe Syria carefully, it has been one of the rare countries that has remained stable and calm during the past few months of global crises. It has not taken sides in any conflict and has not posed a threat to any country. Rather, it demonstrated a commitment to addressing its own challenges, healing its internal wounds, and intensifying efforts to meet the needs of its people. This was precisely the exemplary behaviour both our President and other leaders in the region expected from Syria. We clearly view the continuation of this strategy as being in the best interest of both Syria and the broader region. It is a strategy that paves the way for stability, peace, and development. In this regard, it is of utmost importance for regional security that the policies currently being implemented under Mr. Sharaa's leadership contribute to both peace and development. Now it has once again become evident, particularly in the light of the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz... There are some connectivity projects that have been delayed for many years, yet have been occasionally brought up by us. These projects primarily concern cargo transportation or energy transportation, that is, pipeline infrastructure. It is of significant importance that energy sources from the Gulf can reach international markets via Syria and Türkiye, or conversely, that goods and cargo originating from non-regional countries can be transported to the region not only by sea but also through land and railway routes along the Türkiye-Syria-Saudi Arabia corridor. On this issue, there is currently a consensus among countries. Our Ministers of Transport and their respective teams are working intensively in this regard. Railways are currently among our priorities. During recent meetings between His Royal Highness the Crown Prince, Prime Minister of Saudi Arabia and our esteemed President, these issues were likewise brought onto the agenda. As you can observe, whenever our leaders come together, their discussions focus on advancing connectivity, ensuring energy security, implementing joint projects, strengthening infrastructure, enhancing healthcare services, improving transportation, and achieving greater development. No one is talking about war, destruction, occupation, expansionism, or supporting terrorism. On the contrary, what is being demonstrated by the countries and leaders of this region is a truly exemplary approach. Türkiye is playing a highly significant and pioneering role in this regard. However, unfortunately, some actors do not want to see a change in the adverse fate of our region. There are also those who desire this geography to remain trapped in a cycle of continuous conflict, destruction, and suffering , unable to break free from such a grim picture. We are fully aware of their game, too. But thankfully, when the countries in the region come together, they possess the will and strength to overturn this unfortunate fate and implement projects that prioritize their own peace, development, and prosperity.

Question- [SIMULTANEOUS TRANSLATION] Marcin Zaborowski, TVP World, Poland.

You mentioned the Russia-Ukraine peace process. You also stated that Türkiye has hosted some negotiations. Yesterday, you also held meetings with Mr. Sibiha and Mr. Lavrov. Can we say that they will continue to meet in Türkiye under Türkiye’s mediation in the coming period? Is there a specific date set for this?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN - Our President has repeatedly conveyed, during his meetings with both Mr. Putin and Mr. Zelensky, that we are ready to host such engagements. In other words, Türkiye is always prepared to host meetings both at the level of leaders and at the technical-level. We have no reservations in this regard. We are ready to do it the same way we did it before. We are also ready to support all negotiations held elsewhere. As long as peace is achieved. Good outcomes do not necessarily have to come through our direct involvement; even if they are achieved through others, they are still valuable and deserving respect. We are ready to provide all kinds of support -as long as peace prevails.

Question- [SIMULTANEOUS TRANSLATION] Heqian Xu, from Caixin media organisation.

The year 2026 appears to be an important year marked by increasing cooperation among middle powers. We are witnessing external powers pursuing their strategic goals in different regions, but your country and your government are making numerous efforts in your own region for the benefit of everyone. You have put forward many proposals. Would you send a message to other regional powers or other middle powers around the world to join your efforts and take responsibility for their own regions and begin taking or owning these steps? What would you say?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN - Our friend asked the last question, but he asked such a question that we need to open a completely different section here and use the same time again to discuss the issue. In fact, due to the urgency of the issues, the questions mostly concerned the cessation of regional conflicts. He posed a question that could be summarized as: "How can midsize powers on a global scale harness their capabilities to manage the crises arising from the current power vacuum in the world?" Dear friends; this is an important topic for us. In other words, our traditional neighbourhood relations, our policy of reaching out far beyond our borders, and the relationships we have established had already laid the groundwork for this development. We currently have good relations with all middle-power countries. Japan, South Korea, Australia, on the other hand, the United Kingdom, France and Canada. Currently, there is only one issue stemming from vacuum created by the major powers. The following is being added to the topics we discuss: In this vacuum, how can middle powers come together to cooperate not only in bilateral relations but also in addressing global issues, and how can global problems be shaped through the actions of these countries? What kind of contribution can we make? This is now becoming increasingly important. Because everyone belonged to an alliance, and within these alliances, both regional and national interests were sought to be protected. Now, in today’s international system, based on nation states and at a time when major upheavals are being experienced in international relations, the rules need to be redefined. Amid this uncertainty, no one is operating on autopilot anymore. Everyone must now manage their issues through intensive communication, coordination, and the exchange of ideas. The question our friend posed is also significant from this perspective: Just as a blockage in the Strait of Hormuz today affects South Korea, Japan, and the People's Republic of China, any crisis in the South China Sea will once again affect us. In fact, global impact of regional crises has become an increasingly common phenomenon. This has now become a rule of the system.

Therefore, the distinction between regional and global crises is gradually disappearing. In a period where our economic and information structures are so deeply interconnected and upon which we have built our civilizations, the distinction between regional and global crises no longer exists. Unfortunately, all crises are beginning to affect one another in an increasingly significant way. Therefore, this communication reveals the fact that we must approach this issue with a different mindset and approach than in the past and introduce different structural solutions. In other words, I attach importance to this exchange of ideas and solidarity among middle powers.

Thank you again for your interest and attendance.

Thank you, stay well.

* Deciphered by Interpress- unofficial translation from the Turkish text.