FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Dear press members, I would like to welcome you to our annual assessment meeting, which has now become a tradition, and begin my remarks by wishing you all a good morning.

As you know, we held the first annual assessment meeting last year. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the national and foreign press representatives here for the interest they have shown.

Today, after a brief introductory speech, we will proceed with the assessment meeting by addressing as many of your questions as possible.

Dear friends, in 2025, we witnessed the deadlock within the international system reaching a new level and becoming almost normalised. You also followed this very closely. Last year, the set of rules forming the basis of the global order suffered severe damage that is difficult to repair. One after another, crises began to unfold - which inflicted deep wounds on humanity's collective conscience. In the face of this, we have seen states questioning their existing alliances and seeking to establish new structures. Conflicts, economic fluctuations and technological transformations have forced countries to review their priorities, capabilities and strategies. Meanwhile, for responsible and determined countries, diplomacy has emerged as the sole means of achieving peaceful solutions to problems. For all these reasons, 2025 left a lasting mark on the international system and it was an extremely intense year in terms of Turkish foreign policy.

Dear friends, the genocide in Gaza constituted the most serious and urgent agenda item of 2025 in terms of international law and humanitarian values. It also served as a test of the international system's capacity. It must be stated clearly that today's global governance model has unfortunately failed this test. Türkiye, under the leadership of our President, has made great efforts, together with our friendly and brotherly countries, to stop the genocide and achieve a ceasefire. At this stage, we are faced with a fragile but promising situation. In the coming period, we will continue to work towards transforming the ceasefire into a lasting peace, rebuilding Gaza, and enabling Palestinians to live in peace and tranquillity under the roof of their own state.

Meanwhile, the Russia-Ukraine war has led to debates questioning the established patterns of many issues, from transatlantic relations to Europe's identity, and security architecture. Türkiye made truly intensive efforts, led by our President, to keep diplomatic channels open and ensure steps are taken towards establishing peace, as you have also followed. Efforts to end the war in 2026 will focus on bridging the gap between the ideal and the realistic solution. It is already possible to foresee that the discussions that have begun in the context of the European security architecture will remain one of our main agenda items for many years to come.

Also, the major transformation Syria has undergone and its integration into the international community constituted one of the positive developments of 2025. We hope that the constructive will demonstrated by regional countries, European states and the United States on the Syrian issue will continue with the same determination this year. As you have been following, the "SDF" issue continues to be a problem for Syria, Türkiye and the rest of our region, and we hope that this issue will also be resolved this year. As Türkiye, we will continue our determined and clear policy on this matter in 2026. Last year, we witnessed an increase in Israeli attacks targeting countries such as Syria, Iran and Lebanon, and an intensification of divide-and-rule activities across a broad geography stretching from Somaliland to Iran. This policy is based on the illusion that "Israel can ensure its own security by destabilising its neighbours". We draw attention, at every opportunity, to the fact that this mentality is becoming a threat not only to regional countries but also at global level.

Dear friends, it is clear that our foreign policy, under the leadership of our President, has produced effective and practical results in 2025. In addition to the topics I have mentioned, establishing lasting peace in the Caucasus and further strengthening our relations with Balkan countries and Turkic states were among the topics we devoted the most effort to in 2025. We also closely followed developments in Cyprus, the Aegean, and the Mediterranean. We sincerely demonstrated our will and efforts to develop a common strategic perspective in our relations with the EU. We devoted special effort to our relations with African countries. We conducted mediation activities between Russia and Ukraine, Ethiopia and Somalia, and Pakistan and Afghanistan. We secured the lifting of a large portion of the sanctions imposed on our country in defence industry. We attached particular importance to economic matters and our global and bilateral trade relations. Together with our other institutions, we produced comprehensive and inclusive projects on energy and connectivity issues.

Dear friends, it is important to note that no country can now conduct its foreign policy according to pre-determined templates, as uncertainty has become permanent. Today's international environment is evolving into a structure where rules are eroding, power balances are being reshaped, and only visionary leaders can provide direction. We must establish alliances correctly, define interests accurately, and use tools skilfully. Under the leadership of our President, Türkiye has the capacity to play a decisive role in this period and will continue to do so. Indeed, the fact that we have reached a position where our advice is sought in times of crisis and our mediation and contribution are requested is the result of both the wisdom of the state and the leadership's accumulated experience over many years. As you can imagine, a busy schedule awaits us in 2026. In the new year, we will continue to meticulously pursue our foreign policy priorities. We will hopefully host the NATO Summit, the Summit of the Organization of Turkic States, and the UN Climate Change Summit this year. Türkiye will continue on its path with a principled stance, determination, self-confidence and unrelenting effort, maintaining a balance between the ideal and the reality, and between the values and the interests. Based on this understanding, we will continue in 2026 to take initiative and produce solutions to problems in the vast geography extending from the Balkans to Latin America, from Central Asia to the Eastern Mediterranean. Generating peace, stability, and prosperity for our region will remain our priority.

I would like to thank you all in advance for your participation. Now I can take your questions. Let's start with the front rows, please.

QUESTION- Türkiye Newspaper, Foreign Policy Columnist Sevil Nuriyeva.

Mr. Minister, there are increasing signs that the US will launch a military operation against Iran. Do you anticipate such an operation? You are putting in a great deal of diplomatic effort, and we are closely following it. How is the process unfolding? Has any progress been made? Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Dear friends, as you know, what we have prioritized from the very beginning is regional stability and security. Our region faces numerous problems that we have inherited from the past and that have evolved over time. One of these is the sanctions that Iran has been subjected to for many years, as you know, and some political disagreements in the region. Now, as a neighbour and friend of Iran, we have repeatedly and sincerely shared our views very clearly. Iran is our border neighbour. We share a centuries-old, unchanging border, and the two peoples are very similar, with extensive commercial and social relations. Therefore, we are closely following developments in Iran, as everything that happens there concerns us greatly. It is also in our interest for Iran to resolve its problems with major international actors and avoid destabilizing scenarios that could spread throughout the entire region. For this reason, our priority is to avoid any situation that would necessitate the use of force. Unfortunately, as we saw in recent months, we witnessed attacks from Israel during the Twelve-Day War and then from the United States, albeit limited, and these attacks stopped at a certain point. Now, the possibility of this happening again is something we do not approve of. We want problems to be solved through dialogue, and I believe that widespread instability in Iran is far beyond the region's capacity to withstand. Therefore, we will continue diplomatic efforts, and hopefully, America and Iran will resolve this issue between themselves, whether through mediators, other actors, or direct talks. We are closely monitoring the situation.

Mr. Şendir, please.

QUESTION- Milliyet Newspaper, Özay Şendir.

Mr. Minister, yesterday the second phase of the Gaza plan came into effect. Now a Board of Peace will be formed, followed by the establishment of an International Stabilization Force, and we will monitor the processes of reconstruction, ensuring security, and Israel's withdrawal from Gaza. Where does Türkiye stand in terms of preparations or plans to contribute to these processes? Secondly, do you expect Israel to engage in any behaviour that could undermine the process in these three phases?

Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Yes, yesterday, with the declaration of Special Representative Steve Witkoff, it was announced that we have now moved on to the second phase, which you may have followed a day earlier. We held a meeting, again with the online participation of four countries, in order to discuss how and in what order we will implement the second phase. As you know, we held the first of these meetings in Miami a few weeks before the new year. We are pleased that the process is moving forward, albeit slowly. As you know, our President is incredibly attentive, especially when it comes to humanitarian aid. The fact that Palestinians are left without shelter, medicine and food in the cold deeply wounds the conscience of all of us. We also know that Israel is pursuing a systematic and deliberate policy in this regard. We know that the Netanyahu government is not particularly keen on implementing this peace plan, which the international community wants to implement together. Their ultimate goal is to get the Palestinians out of Gaza. But with the impetus provided by the countries in the region, and now with the pressure from the United States, the international community has brought this peace process to this point. Now that we have moved on to the second stage in recent days, the first priority is for the Palestinian Technocratic Committee, which we have agreed upon as a group, to take over the administration of Gaza, followed by the declaration of the Board of Peace and then the appointment of the executive board that will carry out the daily operations on behalf of the Board of Peace and its commencement of work. There is a sequence of procedures to be followed during this time. We hope that this will be fully completed within the next few weeks, at least in terms of the bodies coming into being. There will, of course, be some difficulties during the implementation, but both we and our other authorities will continue to do our utmost, in close consultation with our other partners, to ensure that this process runs smoothly and that any existing problems do not disrupt the peace process. We are approaching to a positive stage, but as I mentioned, the risks are evident, and Israel's intention is also clear.

Yes, please.

QUESTION- Mr. Minister; Sena Alkan from Habertürk TV.

I would like to ask a question about Syria. Following the removal of the YPG from Aleppo, a decision was made to send military reinforcements to the Meskene-Dayr Hafir region on the west bank of the Euphrates. Do you expect an operation there in the coming days or hours?

Another question: Ahmed al-Sharaa made some statements today, drawing attention to the multi-headed structure of the “SDF” and stating that “the relation with Qandil is an obstacle to a solution”. In light of these developments and statements, what can you say about the overall situation in Syria and the 10 March Agreement?

Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN – The fact that the relation between the “SDF” and Qandil is occasionally treated as newly discovered information, particularly by Western counterparts, is something that surprises us, as it is an information as clear as ‘2 plus 2 equals 4’. We have stated, from the beginning, that this is our biggest problem with the “SDF”. The fact that Syrian Kurds come together on their own to form a movement specific to Syrian Kurds and aim at resolving problems in Syria naturally has a connection to Syria. We are a civilised, developed country - we know the limits of certain countries in resolving their own internal problems, but everyone knows that this is not the case. The fact that the Syrian branch of an organisation that has claims, organizational structures and actions in four countries is called the “SDF” or YPG is a reality that we are all well aware of. Therefore, everyone is aware that whoever goes to negotiate on behalf of the “SDF”, it will not happen without approval from Qandil. This is an issue that constantly complicates matters, but even if it does, our hope is that the 10 March Agreement will be implemented as soon as possible to bring stability to the country.

Look, we warned about Aleppo in the past, we said, “these problems must be resolved; it must not come to use of force.” Now, the issue of vacating, as a sign of goodwill, the areas occupied west of the Euphrates particularly after 8 December 2024, and withdrawing the elements there to the east is on the agenda. This situation keeps repeating itself. From Afrin, Ras al-Ayn and Tal Rifat onwards, and in Aleppo, we always see the same scenario. Then we say, "Your presence here is illegal; these structures, these elements should not be like this.” But they resist, and after force is used, they back down. We need to break out of this pattern now. If they genuinely want to show their goodwill, they need to adopt a problem-solving technique based on diplomacy and dialogue. Appearing to be in dialogue, projecting such an image to the world, gaining time, looking around and thinking, “…will a crisis arise in the region that we can exploit even more?”, and continuing relations with certain actors - you have neither the mental capacity to manage so many parameters, nor does the reality allow it. Put forward good intentions and say “we want stability in Syria, we want the Syrian Kurds to prosper, we want them to feel secure...” Leave Iraq and other issues aside. But we know this is not the case. Hopefully it will be. We are following this issue very closely, and I hope it will be resolved through peaceful means.

QUESTION – Batu Bozkürk, Cumhuriyet Newspaper.

Actually, I would like to continue on the subject of the “SDF”. You frequently emphasize the importance of integration. However, the same agreement also contains articles guaranteeing that all Syrians will be represented in the political process and that the constitutional rights of the Kurds will be secured. Considering what the Alewites and Druze faced last year, can we say that these two articles have been implemented?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN –As you know, since no steps have been taken to implement the 10 March Agreement, there have been a similar issue on this matter too. But let me tell you this: the Syrian Administration does not need the provisions of the 10 March Agreement to implement these; in other words, this is both our demand as regional countries and part of their own agenda. There is no chance of achieving anything by excluding other minorities and religious groups in the country from the administration. Here is the golden ratio: Within the framework of constitutional citizenship, after religious groups and ethnic minorities are included in the administration, they define themselves as a separate group, transform into a political entity, and subsequently become part of the administration... These are two different things, and this is precisely where the problem arises. What we want is for the constitutional citizenship formula, which has evolved in modern times, to work in the interests of all people; that is, a structure, in which people live their own identities, cultures and beliefs while also uniting under one flag and benefiting from all the interests, power and prosperity of the country of which they are citizens, and participate accordingly, is more conducive to stability, peace and prosperity, and this has been tried and tested many times. Given this situation, dividing the country into political entities, creating enclaves based on religion or ethnicity, means an invitation to this division. I am trying to present division here not as an ideological tool, but as a problem for the common good of humanity. But we need to be very careful about this.

Mr. Mesut, yes please.

QUESTION – Professor Mesut Caşın

Sir, as you mentioned, Türkiye is always on the side of peace. If peace is achieved in Ukraine in 2026, what will mission of Türkiye in the Black Sea be? As you know, some ships are being hit.

My second question is, our President told our ally America that ‘the F-35s are necessary for NATO’. Could we possibly get the F-35s this year?

My last question, as a teacher, is that we have also foreign guests here. We are having difficulty getting visas for our students. When our European allies find themselves in difficulty, they say, “Let Turkish pilots come and protect Europe, protect NATO.” I cannot understand why they request visas from our highly distinguished lawyers and doctors.

Thank you very much, Mr. Minister.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Thank you.

Regarding Ukraine, as you know, a Meeting of Leaders was held in Paris recently. The leaders of the countries belonging to the Coalition of the Willing attended this meeting, and we were there representing our President. Of course, there were numerous meetings at the ministerial level and other levels leading up to that meeting. Diplomats, military personnel and everyone came together and worked intensively on what the document, the plan, would be. Now, as I have stated on various occasions before, the peace that will be achieved will not only be a peace between Russia and Ukraine. Essentially, it will also be a peace between Europe and Russia. As you know, after Trump came into power in America, the United States’ decision to change its leading role in the Russia-Ukraine war, shifting to a neutral position, and reconsidering its historical role and responsibility regarding European security has given rise to another problem. While the Russia-Ukraine war was one problem, the position the US took towards the end of the war created another one. So, it means a problem within a problem. In fact, European security very seriously depends on Ukraine’s security. For sure, whether this is realistic as a military strategy should be debated by military strategists. We also evaluate available data.

At this point, if a peace agreement is reached, there are three issues with a military dimension:

Firstly, how will this agreement be followed up, verified and monitored? What is the procedure for this? There are efforts on this. Both SACEUR – the Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO – and other commanders provided information on this issue.

Secondly, how will Ukraine’s deterrence capability continue? There are studies and plans on this.

Thirdly, what kind of measures will be taken in the event of a violation, and what tools will be used to implement these measures, and under what scenario? All planning is being done in this direction.

Of course, following the peace agreement, the military elements have three classic domains—land, sea, and air—for the structures that will be used in all these tasks. In terms of the maritime domain, Ukraine has a coastline only on the Black Sea. The Black Sea is where Türkiye is located, as the largest NATO member, of which we are also a part. We have long sought to assume responsibility for naval command, in accordance with our President’s negotiation instructions. Within the scope of the current plans, this responsibility has been assigned to us. We will assume this responsibility alongside other voluntary countries. This is an input. Our Ministry of National Defence is working intensively on this matter. Of course, the air and land components will be deployed with other countries led by the United Kingdom and France.

Regarding the F-35s, this is actually an issue that has arisen as a result of the implementation of CAATSA. We are not looking at this issue solely from the perspective of the F-35s, we are conducting diplomatic efforts to have CAATSA lifted as a whole. When our President visited Washington after New York, on 25 September last year, Mr. Trump and Mr. Erdoğan agreed to remove this from the agenda of both countries, like some other matters. I have stated this before. We are now working to overcome the technical difficulties and problems in implementing this bilateral will. This will can be seen here. We wish to witness the lifting of CAATSA this year. The matters you mentioned regarding the F-35s and other issues would then also be implemented.

When it comes to visas, as you know, there are essentially two issues in Europe: Firstly, the European Union is increasingly centralising its visa policy into a single visa procedure. In fact, when you apply to any European country, it means you are applying to a single country. The process is becoming increasingly centralised, and the criteria are the same. So firstly, there is such an administrative problem.

As you know, they halted procedures for a long time during the pandemic, and then there were difficulties in getting back to normal. Now they have regained these capabilities, and problems are being reduced in certain areas. But this is the less significant aspect of the issue. The more significant aspect of this issue, dear friends, as you know, is actually the matter of migration and immigration in Europe. This situation is not limited to recent years; it stems from the fact that immigrants, who have always been present, have now become a political tool, and those pursuing this policy are increasingly gaining ground against other parties. European governments do not care anymore on what grounds the foreigners enter their countries, no matter they are doctors or engineers. They do not care about the identity of the person. They are looking at their appearance, their colour, their attitude. The fact that Europe has reached this point is another problematic area for humanity. Experiencing the age of enlightenment, bringing about modernisation, and then turning back the clock is another matter entirely.

But the truth is that immigration has now become the number one political topic in Europe. My fear is that despite the fact that mass migration has already stopped as they already know, the far right still needs this issue to fuel its rise. Europe may now evolve to a point where the policy focus is no longer on receiving immigrants from outside, but on sending those already inside back home. Because, as even the far right now recognises, central governments, centre-left and centre-right governments have developed very strict visa policies and immigration policies, and politically, this may no longer yield results. They are now gradually bringing the concept of ‘“remigration” – that is, the concept of returning migrants – to the fore. As you know, when the far right’s concepts first came to the fore, they had very few supporters, but gradually this side began to have supporters.

In certain European countries, we see that the issues of living with, accepting and being able to coexist with foreigners are currently the number one topic in politics. Of course, the fact that Türkiye, a candidate country for the EU that has been engaged in all kinds of interaction with the EU for years, is experiencing this problem regarding visas is an issue that European countries have also repeatedly pointed out. The solution for eliminating this is the entry into force of the visa liberalisation agreement. We will continue to work more systematically this year to ensure that this agreement is concluded and enters into force. As you know, our President’s attention and determination, particularly on the EU issue, is very strong.

QUESTION- Thank you very much, Mr. Minister. Hacı Yakışıklı, TV100.

After the earthquake of the century in Türkiye, 455,000 homes were destroyed, and two weeks ago, the last of these homes was handed over to its 455,000th rightful owner. As a result, 220,000 containers were left unused in the region. So, right now, there are 220,000 empty containers in the quake-hit area in Türkiye. It was stated by both Minister of the Environment and our President that these containers could be considered for use in Gaza. It is winter, there is great hardship in the region, and there is an expectation among the people, including the Turkish public, that ‘these containers should now go to Gaza’. Do you have any plans in this regard, will these containers reach Gaza, sir?

Thank you very much.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Dear friends, the issue of humanitarian aid to Gaza is our number one priority at the moment. I emphasised this in my opening speech. None of us, especially our President, can bear to see our brothers and sisters there living in the cold, in winter, under these conditions. We raised the matter of containers at the coordination meetings we held. That is why we want these boards to be operational as soon as possible. As you know, the Israelis have long refused to accept any humanitarian aid supplies containing metal components, even in medical supplies. This is because they view these materials as dual-use items. They have adopted this stance because they claim that the resistance fighters there, those resisting the occupation, will use them to make weapons. Of course, I believe that as the UN institutions that will strip the occupying forces of their authority in this matter become operational, resistance in this regard will also diminish. We made our applications and held our discussions on this matter well in advance. We negotiated with the relevant platforms and also held discussions within our own organisation, primarily with our colleagues at the Ministry of Environment and AFAD, who hold these supplies, to see how we could move forward. As instructed by our President, we will send these containers to Gaza immediately if the circumstances allow. We do not have any problems regarding this But as I said, because the containers are made of metal, there are currently some issues, which we are trying to resolve. Instead, the tents sent by Türkiye are currently being allowed in, but tents are not always effective.

QUESTION- [Betül Kayahan-Yeni Şafak] You also stated: "We are in an age of uncertainty, we must build alliances wisely.” In recent days, we have seen that Saudi Arabia has come to the fore as an actor. We see that it prefers to act together with Islamic countries in the region during this process. Foreign media have also reported: “Türkiye wants to be part of an alliance similar to the one formed by Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.” Will we see such a security alliance with Saudi Arabia or Egypt in the upcoming period?

Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN – Dear friends, this is an important matter. If you follow the statements made by our President and by us, we always say that the stability and peace in the region depends on the countries in the region coming together and establishing substantial cooperation. When you examine the chronic problems of the region, you see that the primary issue is the lack of trust between the countries of the region, that this lack of trust creates rifts and problems, or that a hegemonic power comes in from outside and creates problems, or that terrorist organisations emerge from the inside and cause civil wars, bringing other parameters of instability to the fore. We have been experiencing, struggling with and analysing these issues for years.

Consequently, we have the following proposition: We say that all the countries in the region coming together... Previously, it would be like, to move from the economy to the security. Actually, we have been engaging in economic cooperation directly for many years, and it is necessary to establish cooperation and a platform on security issues. For what reason? This is not for outsiders. Countries in the region need to commit to each other's security. Once all countries in the region trust each other, eighty percent of the problem will already be solved. The Gulf countries must trust each other, other countries must trust each other, and I believe that once this platform emerges on a broader scale, the problem will be largely resolved. Other issues can be easily resolved. As of now, these discussions and talks are ongoing, but we have not yet signed any agreement. Our President's vision is for a platform which is inclusive, broader, and generates greater solidarity and stability.

QUESTION- Mete Yarar.

Mr. Minister, you have always conducted long-term analyses due to your previous positions. When discussing matters related to Iran, Syria, and Iraq, we have witnessed both versions of the Hammer Force, both in Iraq and Syria. Can we say that Türkiye considers Mr. Trump's statement, ‘You prepare yourselves, we are coming to help,’ as a new Hammer Force 3.0 in the long term? What will Türkiye's stance be on this matter?

Thank you very much.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- As I stated responding to the previous question: We are against a military intervention in Iran. In other words, Iran must resolve its own internal problems. Of course, this has an aspect that concerns international relations. What is that? The sanctions, for sure. Why is it subject to the sanctions? Because of certain policies it adopts, both globally and regionally. We tell them this too. It needs to resolve its issues with neighbouring countries. It must also resolve its issues on global nuclear matters through diplomacy without delay, so that certain structural problems causing economic difficulties can be eliminated. Now, when you are under international isolation, your capacity to provide certain economic services gradually decreases. Iran has a large population, a dynamic community, sophisticated people with a strong desire to live and participate in life. When you deprive them of certain opportunities, these kinds of problems arise.

What is being confused here is that the hardships people face, such as economic and other difficulties, are seen as ideological rebellion against the regime. In fact, this has now become a grey area. When you look closely, there is not much here that would whet the appetite of certain countries that are enemies of Iran, in terms of hostility towards the regime. But the economic difficulties posed by existing policies, and the inability to resolve them, are causing problems.

Now, we don't want an intervention here, but when you look at Trump's policies, we haven't seen him prefer using ground forces that much so far. The examples you mentioned are more about deploying troops. In terms of military strategy, I don't think he will bring those issues to the agenda that much anymore.

QUESTION- [SIMULTANEOUS INTERPRETATION] [Chen HuiHui-CCTV] I am from CCTV China Central Television.

My question is about China and Türkiye. This year marks the 55th anniversary of our diplomatic ties. And the recent visa-free policy for Chinese citizens has been warmly welcomed. So, can we better align the Middle Corridor with China's Belt and Road to boost trade this year? And how do you see China and Türkiye working together to stabilize the current regional situation?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN – Thank you, that is an important question.

The relationship between Türkiye and China is an important topic for us. As you mentioned, in recent weeks we have implemented a policy of exempting Chinese citizens from visa requirements, signed by our President. This is, of course, a reflection of our desire to advance relations with China. We have a policy set that focuses on trade, investment and connectivity as main agenda items. Of course, our friends who closely follow the progress of our trade policies in particular with China know that this is one of the topics we discuss most when we meet with our Minister of Trade and Minister of Finance. China is one of the countries we trade with the most, with a trade volume of approximately $50 billion. However, there is a very large foreign trade deficit between us and China. Of course, discussions are still ongoing to eliminate this foreign trade deficit. At a certain point, we need to coordinate better and show more understanding towards each other. Currently, Turkish foreign trade is breaking its own record every year; our industry and service sector are, thankfully, very strong. But let's say we now have a very balanced foreign trade with the European Union, amounting to around $230 billion, which represents almost equal imports and exports. This is a situation that is highly beneficial to both sides, generating tremendous economic benefits and mobility. Now we want to do the same with China. There are some countries, like Russia, with which we also have a foreign trade deficit, but we only trade in one item there. We import large amounts of energy and pay a lot of money. What we sell is limited. But China is not like that. We have many tools at our disposal in China, and we can use them. Now, the first step is for China to increase its investments in Türkiye. In other words, our Minister of Industry and Technology has worked tirelessly to encourage Chinese investors, particularly electric car manufacturers, to invest in Türkiye. Our President has also welcomed their proposals on this matter with great satisfaction. However, we do observe that the Chinese are hesitant about bringing certain investments to Türkiye. We occasionally have concerns about whether this hesitation stems from certain political stances.

But I would like to point out that our intention is to advance relations with China in all areas, because China is a powerful country, it has no issues with Türkiye, and it does not share a border with Türkiye. There may seem to be some security-related issues, but these are issues that we have discussed with our Chinese colleagues for years in my previous role, and they are actually issues that always have a solution; there should not be too much concern here. You know our position on the Uyghur issue. I believe that China stands before a historic opportunity. Because relations with Türkiye, a country with a leader like our President, which produces high-quality policies based on the win-win principle without depriving anyone of their rights or violating anyone's rights, can be taken even further with every country and every structure. As you know, Türkiye is one of the leading actors in the Belt and Road Initiative, particularly in the Middle Corridor, given its geographical location and the capacity it can bring to the table. We see that the full potential here has not yet been achieved. Connectivity is an issue that we, both as the Ministry and as the Government, place great emphasis on. We want to implement and mobilise all forms of connectivity and generate benefits from this.

But our talks will continue in the upcoming years. As you know, our President recently visited China, where we participated in the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) Summit. I stayed on afterwards and attended the celebrations there. We had very extensive talks. I discuss regional matters, whenever there is one, with my counterpart, Foreign Minister Mr. Wang Yi. We welcome China's constructive role with regard to regional issues. As you know, China played a mediating role in bringing Iran and Saudi Arabia together. Frankly, we support such constructive roles.

QUESTION- Hello, good morning. Maria Zacharaki from Greek Open Television. Mr. Minister, you had a telephone conversation with your Greek counterpart Mr. Yorgos Gerapetritis a few days ago. As far as we know, this conversation covered the meeting between Mr. Mitsotakis and Mr. Erdoğan planned to be held in Ankara, as well as the High-Level Cooperation Council meeting. Has a date been set for this meeting? Is it possible that the meeting will take place before Ramadan, around mid-February?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN – Yes, that is possible, and we are working on it. I spoke with my dear friend again recently, and we even discussed this matter when we met briefly with Mr. Mitsotakis during the Summit of Leaders in Paris. They also want to do this before Ramadan. We are working on a few dates, and depending on our President's schedule, he also wants to hold this meeting as soon as possible.

QUESTION- Mr. Minister, Manol Kostidi, Kathimerini Newspaper and Skai Television. You mentioned this meeting. What are the expectations now in Turkish-Greek relations? In other words, has there been any difference since you took office? Rather than saying there is tension compared to a year and a half or two years ago, let's say the calm waters are sometimes a bit choppy, and the statements coming from both Greece and Türkiye are raising some questions. What can we expect from the Mitsotakis-Erdoğan meeting? As far as we know, your communication with Mr. Gerapetritis is very good, and he has also stated this, an atmosphere of trust has been established. What can we expect in the next step?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Now, actually, there is not a previous step or a next step, but just one single step, which is to come and sit together with the intention and the will to resolve the existing issues, and we will not leave the table until the issue is resolved, notably the resolution of the Aegean issue, among others.

Well, of course, about territorial waters and continental shelf... We adopt the following stance in resolving this issue: When you look at our President's long-term leadership, he has a great vision and determination, particularly with regard to resolving this issue. We have the following concern: I have no intention of pushing the problem onto the other side. I am saying this as I have said it before. The internal political balance in Greece does not allow any political leader much opportunity to resolve this issue and sign an agreement. Mr. Mitsotakis was re-elected in June 2023, wasn't he? We were elected in May, he was elected in June. He actually received significant support from the public. Our President was aware of this, and so was Mr. Mitsotakis. In fact, it was desired that a genuine commitment be made from this point forward. We have repeatedly stated that we are ready to hold qualified talks, not just exploratory ones, and to take this further and resolve this issue permanently. For this, a will must be put forward. To this end, domestic and foreign policy must at least be put in parentheses on this issue. At this point, in Türkiye, I am trying to be somewhat impartial, and I see that the necessary maturity is abundantly present. However, in Greek domestic politics, Türkiye being perceived as a threat always plays a driving force in politics. When someone tries to do something related to Türkiye, they inevitably have to pay a political price. Now a political leader in Greece must choose between resolving issues with Türkiye and bringing peace to the region, or risking his own political career. But this choice has never been in favour of resolving the issue - this is the reality. And it must be overcome. What must we do? We must implement confidence-building measures. We need to allow the people to interact with each other more. Matters that have no basis, no foundation, should not be used as material for domestic politics as much as possible. Because it is a matter that can be easily used in politics. This is also true for Türkiye, but we have now reached a certain political maturity and this issue should not always be that much... There are times when it should be used in domestic politics, when tensions rise, when threats increase, when certain unnecessary attitudes are adopted, and we must of course respond with the necessary political response. What we do is this. Our people are the first to respond.

What I want to say: our President's determination in this regard continues, and it is possible for us to resolve these matters. But what have we done in the last two years? At least there haven't been as many high-tension situations like in the past where fighter jets engaged in dogfights and clashed with each other. The mechanisms put in place in this regard have worked to a certain extent. Our Armed Forces, in particular, have shown great care in this regard. There is cooperation regarding migrants, and other issues. But I hope that we can resolve this Aegean issue permanently without wasting this historic opportunity. I believe, based on all my realistic analyses, that this is possible. But as I said, we need to separate this issue from the internal political pressure in Greece and discuss it rationally, based on Greece's and Türkiye's national interests.

Mr. Coşkun, yes please.

QUESTION- Mr. Minister, Coşkun Başbuğ, with my respects.

You just mentioned the March 10 Agreement regarding the “SDF” in relation to Syria. There is a process where that Agreement expires on December 31. Now a new period of dialogue has begun. The process is being implemented. Does this mean there will be a new timeline? If so, how long will this process take? Do you foresee an operation or military action if no progress is made?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Dear friends, here is the process ahead of us on this matter: Currently, talks between Syria, the US, and the YPG are ongoing. The United States is engaged in serious mediation efforts on this matter. There are many talks that are not reflected in the public sphere. The US is talking to the YPG, talking to the Syrian government, and holding trilateral talks. There are talks where officials from the YPG and the Syrian government meet together occasionally. As you saw in Ahmed al-Sharaa's statements, it is becoming clear through these talks that the problems on the YPG side are a matter of intent and will. My assessment is that the strategy to be followed in this matter, which we are following very closely, will be as follows: I foresee that the talks will continue in good faith, but if the other side does not reciprocate, the Government will take steps to exercise its constitutional right, its right to sovereignty, and its right to maintain unity and order in its own country. Why? Eventually, you're talking, you want to talk, and there's a mediator on the scene, namely the Americans. They're watching, seeing who seems reasonable and who seems unreasonable. When they look closely, they also see that the lie the YPG has been propagating for years through propaganda doesn't have much of a real basis. Therefore, the government's use of force when necessary is no longer seen as abnormal by others. Because, as you can see, there is no other option left. I hope it doesn't come to that point, I hope the issues are resolved through dialogue, but when issues cannot be resolved through dialogue, I see that the use of force is unfortunately also an option for the Syrian government.

QUESTION- Şebnem Arsu, Der Spiegel. US President Donald Trump has announced that an additional 25% tariff will be imposed on countries trading with Iran. Türkiye is among the countries trading with Iran. I wonder if this issue comes up in your meetings with the US.

Also, as you know, the Middle Corridor and Zangezur are important trade plans for Türkiye. How important are relations with Armenia in this regard or in this context, and are we expecting a new era in relations with Armenia in 2026?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Starting from the latter, we hope to see the Zengezur Corridor come to life as Azerbaijan desires. Because, as you mentioned, it is important in terms of the Middle Corridor in the broader strategic picture, and it is also important in the regional context, namely in terms of connecting Nakhchivan with Azerbaijan's mainland. Obviously, Türkiye's direct access to the Turkic world via the Middle Corridor, as well as to Central Asia, are all valuable topics. There is intense work on this. As you know, maybe yesterday or the day before, while the Armenian Foreign Minister was in the US, a paper was published. They call it “TRIPP,” referring to what we call the Zangezur Corridor, discussing how it can be put into practice. Now there are some technical issues regarding it, we examined that paper in detail. Then, my esteemed colleague Ceyhun Bayramov and I spoke for perhaps a total of two hours yesterday throughout the day about what is written in this paper and how they view it, because their perspective is important. We also informed our President on this matter.

Now, - there are many technical matters, so I won't take up your time with them but in short, our goal is this: We want the Agreement, which has been initialled between Azerbaijan and Armenia, to be finalized through signing, and then to carry out the normalization process of Türkiye-Armenia relations as soon as possible, so that we can continue on our path with stability and prosperity in the region. Currently, there is a will for this among the political leadership in Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Türkiye—all three sides. There are just a few things Armenia needs to do now. As you know, there are elections in Armenia at the beginning of next June, which will also be an important step. We see that Mr. Pashinyan is currently leading in the public opinion polls. We truly support the constructive role he is playing in this regard. This approach and determination must continue.

What was done to Iran... When the news came about the tariffs declared by Mr. Trump, the additional customs duties, we were in Abu Dhabi, meeting with our brothers there. I was in a meeting with Sheikh Tahnoon. They also brought this issue to the agenda. Because they trade with Iran so much. As you know, this is currently a declaration. There has been no work done on a Presidential Decree related to this, nor on which countries will be affected and which materials will or will not be affected. There is a statement. There is nothing else beyond that. Therefore, there is currently no concrete Presidential Decision that we can practically put on our agenda.

QUESTION- Mr. Minister, as you know, last week the Syrian Ministry of Defence conducted operations in the neighbourhoods of Sheikh Maqsoud and al Ashrafiya in Syria. From the very beginning of this process, the Ministry has conducted the process in a very detailed and transparent manner, both in terms of communication and in line with humanitarian and human rights principles. Yesterday, Senator Lindsey Graham made a statement regarding these operations in Syria and stated that he would neither tolerate nor accept a brazen attack against their Kurdish allies, calling on the Syrian government and Türkiye to make a wise choice.

I am curious about what the Foreign Minister of Türkiye, a country with a 500-year diplomatic tradition, thinks about this issue.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Which media outlet are you from?

QUESTION- Türkiye Newspaper, Nur Tuğba Aktay.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Thank you.

Now, dear friends, of course there are many Senators in the US Senate and many Representatives in the House of Representatives. We do not determine the relationship between the two countries or regional policies based on their individual statements. Of course, what every politician says is valuable, but what matters to us is that, in our Parliament, too, there are many different views, many different things are expressed, and Members of Parliament can put forward very opposing ideas on every issue. That is their right. Therefore, we continue on our path taking into account what the White House says and what our counterparts do. At this stage, we have no problems in that regard.

QUESTION- [SIMULTANEOUS INTERPRETATION] [Vana Stellou-SLPress] According to Reuters, I would like to ask you this: An American official has stated that Washington needs to transform the relationship between Türkiye and Israel into a different format. Can Türkiye now evaluate this, and if your answer is yes, under what conditions could this relationship be transformed into a different format?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- As you know, we have answered this question several times before. Our President's will and vision on this matter are extremely clear. We are a country that recognized Israel many years ago. We have repeatedly told them why we are now cutting ties with Israel, cutting off trade. The latest reason is the genocide they started after 7 October. That is why we have brought relations to this point. When Israel's oppression and persecution of Palestinians stops, when everything returns to normal, Türkiye will have no problem seeking normalization in its own relations. But as long as their regional policies continue in this manner... Now, the killing of people by aircraft bombs and snipers may have stopped, but we still see, on our screens, children, women, and the elderly dying every day from cold, hunger, lack of medicine, and lack of treatment because sufficient humanitarian aid is still not being allowed in. As long as all this continues, it is impossible not only for us but for many countries to normalize relations with Israel. Can you see any prime minister from Europe, other than the Greek Prime Minister, going to Tel Aviv and taking a photo there? You cannot. No one is going. Why aren't they going? European leaders are elected, and they know that taking a photo with him is not a pleasant thing in these days. Everyone is thinking about their own voter base. Can he go anywhere other than the United States? He cannot. Maybe he’ll go to Greece, I don't know. So, this isn't just our stance. It's a policy expressed in different formats and styles by the international community that shares the same conscience and values, some expressing it openly like us, others pursuing it without expressing it overtly.

QUESTION- Dr. Eray Güçlüer, Akşam Newspaper.

Mr. Minister, you have just explained in great detail the situation regarding the Syrian PKK. The dialogue is still ongoing, but they are also stalling and playing for time. As you have stated, it is now clear and obvious that the PKK in Iraq is acting in sync with the one in Syria. My question is actually about the escalation of instability in Iran, the increasing imbalance, and the potential impact of a possible US intervention in Iran on the new situation that may develop, specifically on the PKK in Iraq and Syria, that is, the PKK presence in Iraq and Syria and their separatist activities. What will Türkiye's stance be on this issue? Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Do you mean the events in Iran?

QUESTION- Yes, Mr. Minister. So, if the situation in Iran becomes even more unstable, how might this affect the separatist activities of the PKK in Iraq and Syria? What would be Türkiye's stance on this matter?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- We will continue to monitor the situation closely; this is an important issue. An important issue.

QUESTION- Murat Alan, Editor-in-Chief of Akit Newspaper.

Yesterday you were in the United Arab Emirates. You also held a meeting with the Head of State of the United Arab Emirates. My question will be specifically about Yemen and Somaliland. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are currently confronting each other in Yemen. What is Türkiye's position regarding Yemen and what is its role in this conflict? Also, the two countries have opposing views on Somaliland. What will our position be on Somaliland? Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Yes, as the new year begins, you just mentioned a few of the important issues we have been closely following. As you know, when the Yemen crisis began, we immediately established diplomatic contacts with the two brotherly countries and took some initiatives. Of course, the problem could have evolved very differently, but I am saying this based on where it stands now. It is an issue that requires some in-depth analysis, but I am saying this based on where it stands now. This was one of the central issues in the separate meetings I had yesterday with Mr. Mohammed bin Zayed and my counterpart the Foreign Minister, and also National Security Advisor Sheikh Tahnoon. Because the issue is not limited to Yemen; the rift that has opened up between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates over Yemen is clearly not a good thing for our region. The decision by the United Arab Emirates to withdraw entirely from Yemen and to cease supporting the elements it had backed, along with the withdrawal of its own forces and the cessation of its support, has, at a certain point, largely resolved the issue. It is important to emphasize this regarding the United Arab Emirates aspect of this issue. We discussed this in great detail yesterday. We are now seeing the same policy being implemented in Somalia. Of course, Saudi Arabia has a persistent demand here, and it is possible to see that this demand is effective in this regard. Türkiye’s policy is that both Yemen and Somalia should preserve their unity, integrity, and sovereignty within their recognized borders, but the resolution of certain administrative, structural, social, and political problems stemming from history and originating in the present depends on their internal reconciliation. We can assist in the reconciliation process if we can, but ultimately, neither we, nor the regional countries accept any fragmentation.

Yes, please.

QUESTION- I am Ahmet Yeşiltepe, TV100 Foreign News Director.

First of all, I congratulate you for starting this tradition, it is truly very useful. Last year it was also very useful for all of us.

I would like to ask a question about the Eastern Mediterranean. I believe this will also contribute to our Greek journalist friends; we will be like the fourth: The military security line in the Eastern Mediterranean. As you know, Greece, Israel, and Southern Cyprus are deepening their military cooperation in the Eastern Mediterranean. Joint exercises, air defence coordination, intelligence sharing, and base usage are increasingly coming to the fore. Of course, this is mostly assessed as Israel's effort to strengthen its background security through this tripartite line, especially after the tensions in Gaza and Iran. And then, of course, there is the energy line. As we see especially in the Israeli press, efforts are being made to establish a diplomatic platform aimed at balancing Türkiye through Eastern Mediterranean natural gas, maritime jurisdiction areas, and energy lines. Regarding this alliance and these developments, could we get your current assessment of Türkiye's stance and the foreign policy route it will follow, especially this year?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Mr. Ahmet, when it comes to issues regarding national security, we indeed monitor them very closely. In particular, we are closely monitoring any countries, groups of countries, or various entities that implement what we call “restrictive policies,” whether permanent or temporary, specific or general. Because this concerns our national security. Now, we also see a pattern here that is trying to contain. We have had the necessary discussions on this subject and made warnings to our relevant colleagues, let me clarify that. As this is a sensitive issue, I do not wish to disclose our discussions on this matter or use the discourse and expressions we have used in a very explicit manner. This issue does not currently pose an urgent problem, but in terms of its potential impact and the image it conveys, we need to anticipate and address the risk at the earliest stage, while it is still small. We foresee and reject these attempts at containment policies (they are not containment policies) and take the necessary measures. This doesn’t benefit anyone. Let me make this clear: it will only deepen the regional division.

Yes please, now that you are standing up.

QUESTION – Mr. Minister, Mehmet Çelik, Daily Sabah Newspaper.

As you know, Greenland also got its share of President Trump's unpredictable policies regarding different regions. In this context, what is Türkiye's approach as a NATO member? There is currently a security-related build-up of forces in that region by European countries. What kind of policy will Türkiye adopt? Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- This is also an area of tension that we closely monitor. Why is it important? Because, while the Russia-Ukraine war and America's stance in this regard are putting pressure on the European security architecture, it is important that a new area of controversy is now opening up over Greenland and this pressure is evolving into a different dimension, and the division has become more apparent... What about the European security architecture? It is important for us. So, as I mentioned earlier, it is our primary trading partner, and we have historically maintained very close ties with it in all areas, including social and humanitarian matters. And we aspire to become a member of the European Union. The region is important for us. Our immediate West is our only stable area, and our North, South, and East are constantly problematic regions. We want to protect this region of stability together with the EU. We are closely following this ongoing controversy, which will have an impact on it.

Yesterday's meetings were important, let me tell you that. Yesterday was an important start when the parties finally came together after exchanging numerous statements and expressed their initial positions to each other for the first time. Later, as you know, they decided to establish a permanent working committee. These initial positions are always maximalist, but I think they can meet somewhere in the middle. So, there is of course some internal political manoeuvring going on around this matter. but its reflection on foreign policy and strategy is significant. We will be closely monitoring this.

Mr. Nuh, yes please.

QUESTION - Nuh Albayrak, Star Newspaper.

Mr. Minister, how might the Damascus Government's operation in Aleppo affect the Terror-Free Türkiye (and therefore the Terror-Free Region) process being conducted in Türkiye? There are different takes on it. Perhaps you don't wish to make a political comment, but DEM's stance on this issue has worried us. Moreover, DEM's position in the Terror-Free Türkiye is also very important. Therefore, could you comment on the effects of this operation on the ongoing process? Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Dear friends, this process in Türkiye, which is being carried out under the great political acumen and leadership of our President and with the truly significant support of Mr. Bahçeli, is a historic and valuable process. In particular, Mr. Bahçeli's historic responsibility and initiative in this regard should be noted, and this opportunity should under no circumstances be missed.

Now, at this point we have reached, we are not actually surprised that the issues we previously analysed and anticipated are now surfacing one by one. But now, these unspoken issues and the problems that have arisen must be addressed in terms of how they can be incorporated into the existing process from a political perspective, how they can become part of it, and how they can be managed. As a result of the discussions on this matter, you know that through our intelligence service, we are aware that the organization's leader, Öcalan, is giving instructions from the island to those in Iraq and Syria. This issue is not limited to Türkiye alone. If there are terrorist elements and infrastructure on the other side of the border that pose a security threat to us, what guarantee is there that this area will not become infected again after it has been cleared? Assurance must be provided on this matter. Now, regarding this, I attribute the organization's reluctance to take decisive action, especially in Syria and Iraq, to one thing. They are trying to assess what these regional crises will evolve into - whether they can gain any more opportunities from Iran, whether they can gain any more opportunities from Syria, whether Israel is playing a destabilizing role in this regard, and where that role might lead. This is quite clear.

Secondly, speaking frankly once again, in order to exist in the region, they have developed relationships over many years on other people's land. They have relationships with Iran, they have relationships with Israel, they have relationships with the Iraqis, with others, with everyone. None of the assessments by the owners of these relations regarding regional security and regional interests match each other. We are talking about an organization that works against us, while serving the interests of everyone else. Now, when they need to manage that in their way, it results in them not establishing good relations with Türkiye. So, hopefully this process will go well; that's truly our intention; however, we hope that they will break free from this web of relationships and the traps they create, and set more sincere, more realistic goals; because working for the service of people is a different matter from working for the service of the organization. As long as you continue to keep the organization alive, you cannot escape that trap of relationships. But if you ask yourself where the public interest and general welfare lie, you will find a path more easily. However, reaching that level of mentality is indeed very difficult.

QUESTION- Mr. Minister, thank you. Harun Erözbağ, Ekoturk.

Mr. Minister, the US operations against Venezuela are important not only from a humanitarian perspective but also, especially, from a market perspective. In this regard, have you had any talks with the parties involved? Türkiye has already issued a statement of condemnation. As a result, it was also aimed to increase trade relations with Venezuela up to $ 5 billion. In this respect, how do you expect bilateral relations to take shape this year?

Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Dear friends, as you know, Venezuela's new interim President and Mr. Trump made separate statements yesterday. They expressed how productive their joint phone conversation had been and how much further trade, economy, cooperation, and wealth would progress from now on. Actually, there is a unique situation here, specific to Venezuela. Of course, we will continue to develop our relations with Venezuela as much as possible, both commercially and in other areas. At the moment, we see that there is mutual understanding between Venezuela and the American government. They have created a roadmap, as it seems, after the recent unfortunate incident. we now see two countries continuing their way. So, we will continue to maintain our relations.

Yes, please.

QUESTION - [İsmail Öz-Diriliş Postası] Mr. Minister, you are the Foreign Minister of Foreign Affairs but on the other hand, you have also an academic side. I would like to ask a question directed at that particular side of you. As you know, the world is experiencing a system crisis today, along with the bottleneck of the five-power system. On the other hand, this also constitutes a state of affairs that negates the "si omnes" and "erga omnes" principles in international law, which set forth the conditions for coexistence. Therefore, here we witness this international system around the world advancing like sand dunes in the desert—one day here, the next day there. So, in terms of the US and the others, will it be possible to imagine a world that offers hope for the future, where optimism prevails and different people can unite and become strong? Could you draw us a perspective, please?

Thank you

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- This is indeed an important question. It could be the subject of a longer and more detailed analysis, maybe a discussion, but to say a few things briefly: One needs to read history carefully, make good analyses, and draw sound conclusions from it. We see that history is constantly evolving, and as long as humans exist, all kinds of good and all kinds of evil can appear. Therefore, I believe that hope for goodness should never be lost. Of course, the crisis we are experiencing is related to the fact that the order of nation states, which we have actually created ourselves and benefitted from, is being shaken. In other words, we will all witness, first-hand, how nation states produce new systems for self-renewal within themselves, or what form the evolution of the nation state will take. However, in this regard, our stance, our position, our policies and our values are clear. This clarity is already half the journey through these stormy times in foreign policy - at least you know where you're going. The other half depends on the skill demonstrated by our President.

Hopefully, there will be no problems.

QUESTION - [SIMULTANEOUS INTERPRETATION] Thank you very much Mr. Minister. I'm from Xinhua News Agency, my name is Wang.

My question is in regards of the situation in Iran now. Do you have any plan to urge your citizens to leave Iran? Because many other countries already did this. And do you have any plan in the future, or are you prepared to accept more Iranian refugees crossing the border to Türkiye? This is my first question.

My second question is in the past several years, China and Türkiye made some progress in terms of the cooperation in the Silk Road and Middle Corridor. Also, train travel is already possible through the Middle Corridor from China to Türkiye and even to Europe. So, how do you evaluate this progress you made, this achievement you made, in terms of this cooperation? And what is the next step for the two countries' cooperation in terms of the Silk Road?

FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FİDAN- Thank you.

Now, of course, we are taking the necessary measures and consular precautions regarding the events in Iran. We have measures in place for all countries and scenarios related to consular cases, and we implement these when the time is right. Regarding Iran, our measures on this matter are already evident. We have necessary plans in place for the employees, citizens, diplomats, officials, businesspeople, and students. But we hope that the situation in Iran calms down as soon as possible, and we do not witness any further tragedy.

Regarding the refugees, hopefully we will not come to such a point, and frankly I don't think we will. But Türkiye is a big country, you see examples from recent history, but as I said, hopefully, I assess that there will be no need for measures and actions on this issue.

Our work on the Silk Road, especially on the issues of connectivity with China, is important, as I tried to express in the previous question. China has turned into a major manufacturing hub. This manufacturing hub requires several things. First, it needs to draw energy from wherever possible. Secondly, it requires large and regional transportation infrastructure to sell the goods it manufactures and to procure raw materials for the goods to be manufactured. We see that China has actually implemented these strategic goals through various projects such as the One Belt, One Road Initiative, the Middle Corridor, and the Silk Road. Of course, while doing this, China was also bringing up a point; that's what's important: It was bringing up the fact that it was doing this, but that it was pursuing a win-win model and opening up an area of benefit for others as well. So, it said, “What I want is not just for China, but also for you. What is it, for example? I will implement the Middle Corridor. Türkiye's infrastructure is important, I will invest 30 billion dollars in Türkiye's railways." This is important both for Türkiye and for China's broad connectivity strategies. There are other similar matters.

But we see that China attaches great importance to these projects, particularly those regarding ports. It is making a serious effort to implement the One Belt, One Road Initiative and energy lines. Though apparently, the port must have been sufficient, because so far, we have seen that there has not been much interest in railways passing through Türkiye in particular. China was interested in it in the past. This project reached a certain point before coming to a halt. What I want to say from here is that it can be brought back to life. In other words, both sides have put in a lot of effort, over many years, on this matter. Our Ministry of Transportation has spent a lot of time working on documents related to this matter. The Chinese side is well aware of this. In addition, China can cooperate with Türkiye as part of its policy of shifting its production hubs to other countries, instead of seeking only to centralize them. Our President has repeatedly stated that we are open to all kinds of mutually beneficial and interest-based cooperation that does not disturb other countries. We attach importance to our cooperation with China.

Dear friends, thank you very much for your attention. We have gone slightly over our time this year, and I would like to thank each and every one of you for your patience and interest.

* Deciphered by Interpress- unofficial translation from the Turkish text